2:02am

Thu May 16, 2013
Parallels

U.S. Hands Over Nation-Building Projects To Afghans

Originally published on Thu May 16, 2013 3:24 am

On a sunny spring day in eastern Afghanistan's Paktia province, Afghan officials and U.S. troops and civilians gather inside the ancient mud fort in the center of Forward Operating Base Gardez. They're attending a ceremony marking the formal end of the work of the provincial reconstruction team, or PRT.

As the international military presence in Afghanistan draws down, so too are these small units, which often consist of dozens of military personnel along with a few civilians. The teams have spent billions of dollars building schools and roads, and they've tried to help strengthen the capacity of Afghan local governance.

The U.S. launched its first reconstruction team in Paktia in November 2002, just months after a major military operation aimed at clearing Taliban and al-Qaida militants from the area. It was a new twist on an old concept: nation building.

"This unique organization comprised of active Army, Air Force, Army National Guard, Army Reserve, U.S. government agencies, all work together to provide governance, security, economic assistance and reconstruction for Paktia province," says Capt. Eric Rauglas, who emceed the closing ceremony.

Nation-Building Teams

The reconstruction teams were designed to build things the Afghans needed, promote security, and to win hearts and minds. And, as military units, the teams were designed to operate in areas too insecure for traditional development agencies to work.

Over the years, the U.S. and its allies created 26 PRTs across Afghanistan. More than half remain in operation, but they will all be gone by the end of 2014, when the current NATO mission ends.

"[They were] always designed to just buy time and space for our Afghan leaders to establish a strong and responsive government," says Air Force Lt. Col. John Chong, the last of 14 commanders to serve as head of the Paktia reconstruction team.

That high staff turnover is one of the major criticisms of the reconstruction efforts.

But at the Gardez base on the day of the ceremony, everyone is singing the praises of the Paktia team.

"The people of Paktia province will not forget the assistance they received," says Juma Khan Hamdard, the provincial governor. "The people will continue to have needs here. Before they asked the PRT for assistance, and now they will ask the provincial government."

Will The Afghan Government Provide?

Hamdard says he hopes the central government in Kabul will provide him with the financial support the reconstruction team once did so he can deliver projects and services now.

Some of the attendees at the ceremony believe it will. But Jamila Yousefzai, with the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission, isn't so sure.

"We don't believe that the government will be able to deliver 100 percent of the services the PRT was doing," she says.

But U.S. diplomat Stephen McFarland believes the Paktia provincial government is ready to stand on its own.

"You stay too long and inadvertently you smother the capacity that you're trying to build up," he says.

McFarland and others acknowledge it's been a struggle to find a balance between providing services the local governments couldn't, while not creating a culture of dependency on the reconstruction teams, who have access to vast amounts of money and the ability to make things happen quickly. The Paktia team has spent more than $280 million in its time on the ground.

"The presence of PRTs and a lot of international advisers, and a high dependence on them, it kind of made the provincial administrations a little bit lazy," says Hamid Afghan, who manages PRT transition issues for the Afghan government. "Even simple works, they were relying on PRTs," he says.

At times through the years, the reconstruction teams have come in for criticism from Afghan officials, including President Hamid Karzai, who decried what he termed a parallel structure that was working on projects without coordinating with his government.

That was a result of an early culture of doing so-called quick-impact projects designed to win hearts and minds, says Afghan, the government official. That approach led to countless poorly planned and constructed projects that have been abandoned.

He cites a project in Badakhshan province, where a new bridge was built — with no road access.

And some of the work by Afghan subcontractors was so shoddy that it had to be knocked down and restarted. Tales of the money wasted in the process of contracting and subcontracting are legendary.

Clare Lockhart, author of Fixing Failed States, says that several years ago there was a sea change in the approach.

"Where they've worked, they really have been geared to supporting and building Afghan governance," she says.

The teams began to tailor projects to Afghan needs. And they began to focus more on strengthening the capacity of provincial governments. But, Lockhart adds, that capacity still varies enormously across the country.

Progress In The Panjshir Valley

As a result, some provinces are more likely than others to be able to complete the many unfinished projects being handed over to them as the reconstruction teams leave. It's too soon to tell if the Paktia government can stand on its own. But other teams have been closed long enough to judge their legacy.

The Panjshir Valley is a few hours' drive north of Kabul. It's one of the most scenic places in Afghanistan. And it's also one of the safest.

Standing in a valley, Mohammed Tahir, head of technical services for Panjshir province, points to all the surrounding projects. There are wind turbines on top of one of the peaks. The road we're standing on, still under construction, was another project. Many of the government buildings were constructed by the U.S.-run Panjshir reconstruction team, which left in the summer of 2011.

Tahir says that the team provided money and technical expertise, but Afghan contractors did the work, and they are still working on projects here. He admits the quality of the work is uneven, but he believes the government will have no problems completing the projects.

However, some Panjshir residents weren't so sure.

"Americans were doing a good job in terms of construction, but the work slowed down when the local authorities took over the projects," says 25-year-old Haji Ahadmir, who works as a driver. "The work on important projects like building schools and roads has stopped now."

A number of people said the central government isn't providing the support to Panjshir that the reconstruction team did. That's where Afghan and Western officials say the real problem lies: For the foreseeable future, Kabul won't have the resources to make up for the drop in reconstruction team spending. And that could undermine provincial governments as they try to stand on their own.

NPR's Sultan Faizy contributed to this report.

Copyright 2013 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

Transcript

STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:

It's MORNING EDITION, from NPR News. I'm Steve Inskeep.

DAVID GREENE, HOST:

And I'm David Greene. Good morning. As NATO troops make their plans to withdraw from Afghanistan, there are serious questions about that country's stability. The stability will rely, at least in part, on the success of provincial reconstruction teams, or PRTs. They're small military units who are partnering with civilian experts to focus on development in that troubled country.

Over the past decade, these teams have invested millions to build schools, clinics and roads. But as NPR's Sean Carberry reports, they have a mixed record.

(SOUNDBITE OF MARCHING BAND)

SEAN CARBERRY, BYLINE: It's a sunny spring day in Eastern Afghanistan's Paktya Province. U.S. troops and civilians and Afghan officials are gathered inside an ancient mud fort in the center of Forward Operating Base Gardez to mark the formal ending of the work of the Provincial Reconstruction team.

The U.S. launched its first PRT here in November of 2002, just months after a major military operation aimed at clearing Taliban and al-Qaida militants from the area. The PRT was a new twist on an old concept: nation building. Captain Eric Rauglas is the host of the closing ceremony.

(SOUNDBITE OF CEREMONY)

CAPTAIN ERIC RAUGLAS: This unique organization comprised of active Army, Air Force, Army National Guard, Army Reserve and U.S. Government agencies all work together to provide governance, security, economic assistance and reconstruction for Paktya Province.

CARBERRY: PRTs were designed to promote security by building things. They were also part of the campaign to win hearts and minds. As military units, the PRTs were designed to operate in areas too insecure for traditional development agencies. Juma Khan Hamdard, the governor of Paktya Province, praised the work of the PRT, but he says there will be challenges ahead.

GOVERNOR JUMA KHAN HAMDARD: (Through translator) The people will continue to have needs here. Before, they asked the PRT for assistance, and now they will ask the provincial government.

CARBERRY: They will ask, but will they receive? Some here believe Kabul will step up. But Jamila Yousefzai with the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission isn't so sure.

JAMILA YOUSEFZAI: (Through translator) We don't believe that the central government will be able to deliver 100% of the services the PRT was providing.

CARBERRY: But U.S. diplomat Stephen McFarland believes the Paktya Provincial government is ready to stand on its own.

STEPHEN MCFARLAND: You stay too long, and inadvertently, you smother the capacity that you're trying to build up.

CARBERRY: Ambassador McFarland and others acknowledge it's been a struggle to find a balance between providing services the local government couldn't, while not creating a culture of dependency on the PRT.

At times, through the years, the PRTs have come in for criticism from Afghan officials, including President Hamid Karzai, who decried what he termed a parallel structure that was working on projects without coordinating with his government.

That was a result of an early culture of doing so-called quick-impact projects designed to win hearts and minds, says Hamid Afghan, who handles PRT transition issues for the Afghan government. That approach lead to countless poorly planned and constructed projects that have been abandoned.

HAMID AFGHAN: For example, in Badakshan, a bridge was built, but there was no road access to that.

CARBERRY: Clare Lockhart is the author of "Fixing Failed States." She says that several years ago, there was a sea change in the PRT approach. The teams began to tailor projects to Afghan needs, and they began to focus more on strengthening the capacity of provincial governments.

CLAIRE LOCKHART: Capacity varies enormously across the country as a result of many different factors.

CARBERRY: It's too soon to tell if the Paktya government can stand on its own. But other PRTs have been closed long enough to judge their legacy. Mohammed Tahir is head of technical services for Panjshir Province, one of the safest places in Afghanistan. He points to all the PRT projects surrounding us.

There are wind turbines on top of one of the peaks. The road we're standing on, still under construction, was a PRT project. Many of the government buildings were constructed by the U.S.-run Panjshir PRT, which left in the summer of 2011.

MOHAMMAD TAHIR: (Foreign language spoken)

CARBERRY: Tahir says the Panjshir government will have no problems completing the work, but Haji Ahadmir, a local driver, is not so sure.

HAJI AHADMIR: (Through translator) Americans were doing a good job in terms of construction, but the work slowed down when the local authorities took over the projects.

CARBERRY: That's where Afghan and Western officials say the real problem lies: For the foreseeable future, Kabul won't have the resources to make up for the drop in PRT spending. And that could undermine provincial governments as they try to stand on their own. Sean Carberry, NPR News, Kabul. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.

Related program: